Why News Ltd should support Media Inquiry?
In the aftermath of the phone hacking scandal in the UK, Australians support for one company owning nearly 70% of print media outlets has collapsed!
This sends a very clear and strong message that the newspaper outlets in this country have lost any potential mandate to be it implied, or otherwise to carry on with reporting news stories around an agenda based framework.
A description which very comfortably fits with how News Ltd operates in general, and frankly that would be a very diplomatic way of looking at how News Ltd fits into this.
A much more blunt way of putting it would be that they need to submit to the public demand that they should face a dismantling of their control because they do a spectacularly lousy job.
People across the board regardless of personal politics now think that these people need to be held account for the damage they’ve done to the reputation of good journalism in this country.
Not too mention the damage they’ve done to the country’s cultural identity.
Looking back over the various incidents that demonstrate News Ltd’s incompetence it would be very hard to disagree with such a blunt assessment.
Who can forget how The Daily Telegraph under the editorship of David Penberthy brought down then NSW Opposition Leader: John Brogden. Then after that they proceeded to kick Brogden, while as many observers called Brogden “Political Dead Meat” with no real news worthy value as he had resigned the leadership.
Rightly the Telegraph was accused of hyena journalism and readers and members of the public could be forgiven for thinking that in the same way the paper has accused Labour union bosses of being faceless men in removing various state and federal leaders over the last few years. The Telegraph had acted in the exact same way in removing a more moderate leader of the coalition in favour of bowing to the conservative side of the party that the paper aligns itself with.
Even ‘footy’ fans weren’t immune to such gutless behaviour; just last year the Melbourne salary cap controversy exposed similar tactics in how News Ltd waters down the flames.
Just like the excuses made in the UK Phone Hacking Scandal, News Ltd asked the public to trust that the management of the company had no idea that laws were being broken and that any illegal activity was the work of a couple of rogue administrators within the organisation.
It all sounds a little bit too easy and familiar, especially when News Ltd willingly censored the breaking news story on the phone hacking scandal in the UK.
All but The Australian newspaper failed to report on the controversy, even then the report itself was about twenty six words long.
If News Ltd seriously expects the public to buy that the way in which it deals with itself out here is not reflected in the exposing of its gutless tactics in the UK then not reporting on the story itself is a great way of taking a dump on your on credibility.
News Ltd need to and should support an inquiry into Media regulation of ownership if not to save their own credibility then at the very least to assure it’s readership and other sections of the organisation that they don’t have anything to do with news reporting, that they do support the best and most indiscriminate way of going about setting the national agenda.
Not supporting an inquiry would mean they believe they are above the concerns of the general public, which of coarse they’re not.